Joy Victory has been deputy managing editor of william hill足球HealthNewsReview.org since 2016.她发微博@thejoyvictory.
In 2015,a few months before I started working at william hill足球HealthNewsReview.org,世界性杂志发表了我的文章，"Why are so many American women dying in childbirth?"
厌倦了女人为这个问题受到指责，I used my personal story to explore the fissures in U.S.孕产妇保健：在我出生的医院，威廉希尔足球and in my prenatal midwife appointments near the end of my pregnancy,I didn't feel safe,我觉得没人听我说，and I didn't feel respected.
现在，在我最后几周的工作中，as william hill足球HealthNewsReview.org comes to a close,I find myself (gratefully) reflecting on a recent opposite experience.In November,我做了腹部腹腔镜手术，我不可能要求一个更好的医疗队和医院。I felt safe,我觉得听到了，I felt respected.我也感觉到pampered,as the hospital had plenty of extra perks,就像个人床加热器，一个整天陪在我身边的富有同情心的护士，and a rooftop garden.让我大吃一惊的比尔，covered by my insurance,揭示了这一切的可能性。
In the days after,I kept thinking,真是太好了，but where's the middle ground?可靠的，effective 威廉希尔足球care without bells and whistles that make it unnecessarily expensive?
当我下班后回来工作治疗的时候，这一思想扩展到了医疗保健新闻：我们看到了许多非常低质量的新闻—威廉希尔足球—草率写作，公然宣传，经常被塑造成点击诱饵。Too much money is apparently being spent on daily not-ready-for-prime-time health 威廉希尔足球care news – money that dresses up unimportant health care news with attention-grabbing wrapping paper that isn't warranted.为什么人们甚至被付钱做礼拜，churning out junk news every day to meet some quota?And why are some being paid to put their name on what is really just a regurgitated news release?
在光谱的另一端，a handful of news organizations regularly offer up stellar investigative or in-depth explanatory journalism, which we've made sure to showcase in our五星级星期五系列.我们的提名者都有两个共同点：他们花时间和金钱创造，对于许多新闻机构来说都是供不应求的。
但不是每一个故事都需要成为点击诱饵或者配得上普利策。中间地带——完整而高效的报告——是读者想要和需要阅读的内容。一吸引我们10 criteriacan be a good starting point for this kind of journalism,as these review examples demonstrate:
More of this kind of reporting is what readers want–and need–as they wade through an increasingly complex and expensive health威廉希尔足球care system,充满了错误的激励，治疗效果可疑，weaker regulations,and minimal accountability.
这里的前两个例子是“长视”，而不是专注于一项新的研究，they take a wider look at the health problem at hand,以及研究显示的——但没有显示。第三个例子以一项新的研究为起点，对逐渐减少类阿片治疗慢性疼痛的挑战进行了更广泛的讨论。Richly sourced,他们离点击诱饵很远，然而，他们不需要任何特别的调查或花哨的故事讲述。
换言之，他们走在中间地带，这样做，stand out from the crowd.